Or: The 2018 NFL Season, The Fix Is (STILL) In Style


So did you know that the NFL only partially reviews plays that its claims to review? The league does this to determine if a full-blown review is necessary. Does this make you say, "Huh?" It should. But this is the play from Thursday night's Steelers v. Panthers that brought this fact to light:

This was determined to be a catch...thanks to a partial review. How do I know it was only sort-of looked at? Because the NFL itself told us so which is related in this article. I find this rather strange given that NFL HQ is in charge of all replays now and what else do they have to do but review plays?! Why don't all plays in need of review get full reviews? No explanation is given on that, so you decide why that is.


Boing! Boing! Boing! Boing! Bears kicker Cody Parkey hits the upright four times in one game? (Oddly enough, it was in a game versus the Lions which was also the team that the Packers were playing when their kicker Mason Crosby completely flamed out). A NFL goalpost is six inches wide. Parkey nailed it four times. He couldn't hit it that often, that solidly if he tried. Yet here it is for all to see. Still wondering about that idea of magnetized balls/uprights?

So far, my one and only NFL prediction for the 2018 season is hanging in there. Sure, the Rams, Saints, and Chiefs all look awesome now, but there's still story lines to be made (and injuries to happen). And one question that some people have asked me about is if the Rams (and/or Chargers) will become #LAStrong in the wake of these wildfires (and/or the already forgotten nightclub shooting)? If either/both teams do pick up that hashtag and run with it -- look out! It might very well lead to a Super Bowl and championship. It did for the likes of the Saints, Red Sox, Astros, and last year's Vegas Golden Knights (who are currently cellar dwellers in the NHL -- as I predicted). Not that either LA team needs a hashtag given that their success(es) seem to correlate to the new stadium opening in LA next year, but if that is added to the mix, whichever team backs the #strong movement will be hard to stop.


I'm a bit at a loss as to what to write about this week because it was a whole lotta meh. I mean, I could talk about how the Vegas sports books took it on the chin this week as most of the favorites easily covered the point spread, but so what? In two weeks (give or take), Vegas will make that "lost" money back...with interest. It's pretty easy to pick games like the Browns v. Chiefs or the Lions v. Vikings or the Bears v. Bills or Panthers v. Buccaneers -- very good teams against bad teams. The only trick is the spread. And given that the good have been very good and the bad very bad (like the Raiders who are now basically tanking away the rest of this season), Vegas is going to have to adjust its numbers moving forward.

Or I could circle around back to field goal and PAT attempts, and the possibility of their manipulation:

What caught my interest with the subject this week is when Sunday Night Football repeatedly showed kickoffs from the angle of their overhead "spider" camera. The kickoffs were always straight and true, no dip, dives, sharp turns, etc. Why is that? The tee? Does it make that much of a difference? Or is there something technique-wise on FGs that's radically different than on kickoffs? Or is it in fact something more sinister?

Of course, there's always bad/questionable plays:

People think offensive lineman can't affect games/outcomes. Granted, it's the Cowboys tight end (#89) in the example above who completely fails at his job -- purposefully, in my opinion, because why not block the incoming LB in favor of diving on a man already basically blocked/down? But seriously, control a member of the O-line, and you can rig just about any game. And who's looking for such play?

But I think you fine readers already understand all of this. And this week was just more of the same from the NFL. Soon, very soon I'm guessing, the playoff hype will ramp up with the true storylines emerging. Then it will get interesting to see who the media -- and in turn, the league -- is really backing and how far guys like Patrick Mahomes will go this season. So consider this the proverbial calm before the storm.

WEEK 8.5

It totally slipped my mind when posting my Week 8 review, but two tragedies led to two wins. First, Seahawks owner Paul Allen passed away this week, and even though it was a road game for the 'Hawks, they trounced the Lions 28-14 after added a commemerative patch to their jersey. Then after the horrific mass shooting in Pittsburgh and a moment of silence, the home town Steelers wiped the floor with the Browns 33-18. Neither win was completely unexpected, yet in light of the circumstances surrounding this games/teams, it was as if both wins were "needed."


So the NFL made the unusual move of firing one of its officials in the middle of the season. Hugo Cruz, the referee blamed for missing the false start which resulted in a Chargers touchdown earlier this year, became the first NFL referee to lose his job like this in the Super Bowl era. Cruz supposedly missed several key calls and had to go. I think there's more to this story than has been made public.

I find this funny because NFL referees miss calls all the time. Key calls. Crucial calls. Yet Hugo gets the axe? Just two weeks ago, the Packers v. 49ers game was changed due to an illegal contact penalty on the 49ers Richard Sherman. This week in the Packers v. Rams game, FOX showed three occasions where the Packers DB clearly held the Rams WR without a flag being thrown. That's just what was shown on replay, so who knows how often it really occurred. What happened to illegal contact being a point of emphasis? What happened to the refs who missed those calls? Hmmm....

Speaking of that Packers v. Rams game, what was Packers KR Ty Montgomery thinking when he attempted to return a kickoff out of the endzone with under 3 minutes remaining in the game and the Packers down by 2 points? During his return attempt, Montgomery fumbled, the Rams recovered, and another potential Aaron Rodgers comeback was thwarted. Subsequently, Montgomery was traded off the Packers to the Ravens on Tuesday for a box of socks. Some claimed Montgomery intentionally defied the coach's order to take a knee/touchback on the play because (a) he was upset at being pulled from the game the drive before or (b) according to Montgomery, he made a split second decision which he thought he had to bring it out because it was too close to the goalline not to do so.

But what if Montgomery attempted to return the kick and fumbled intentionally because there are deeper seated reasons no one outside the team realizes? Is that possible? Could Montgomery have in fact been angry at the team for seeing his playing time diminish? Could there be friction between him and Rodgers, McCarthy, or someone else? And could that have come to a head in this game with Montgomery in the heat of the moment deciding, "F--- you all?" I've heard of similar type of reactions within sports because, let's face it, the "family" idea of a team isn't always the truth.

In that same game, right after the Rams recovered the fumble, Rams RB Todd Gurley had a chance to score a TD, putting the Rams up by 8 (9 with the extra point) with about 20 second left in the game. Instead, Gurley stopped short and was tackled, still ensuring a Rams victory. This was the smart play, however, it was costly to many football fans in America. See, he cost fantasy football players a touchdown, but more importantly with the point spread on the game anywhere from the Rams -9.5 to -7, it cost bettors a cover. Shockly, Gurley tweeted about this.

Again, I'm not saying his play was foolish, but the fact that he acknowledged the betting post-game is somewhat troubling. Did he know the spread before/during the game? Was he cognizant what stopping short meant to bettors? Could this be viewed as "fixing," even if not 100% intentional? The trouble with expanded sports gambling is that these sorts of things should be looked at closer because not all are just fun and games.

Elsewhere, four members of the Jaguars were (briefly) arrested over a $50,000+ bar bill the night before the team took on the Eagles in London. Not surprisingly, the Jaguars lost the game 24-18.

Then there was the Monday Night game with the Patriots playing the Bills in Buffalo (which was the first time the Bills hosted a MNF game in over a decade). The Pats were -13.5 favorites, and no one thought it would be close. But at halftime the score was 9-3 Patriots, and at the end of the third quarter it was 12-6. To me, it appeared as if Tom Brady and Co. were tanking it to keep the Bills in the game for the sake of ESPN because the game wasn't out of reach for the Bills until 6 minutes remained when a Derek Anderson pick-6 sealed their fate. Pats won (and covered) 25-6.


It's Week 7 and there seems to be only a handful of teams that matter. In the NFC, there's the Rams, Saints and Vikings. In the AFC, there's the Chiefs, Chargers and as always, Patriots. A few teams -- Texans, Packers, Redskins, Cowboys, Steelers, Ravens, Panthers -- are "in the hunt" but for the most part, I really think it'll come down to those first six teams I rattled off when all is said and done. And there's still more than half the season to go!

So instead of discussing this bad call or that one (or the fact that in the game against the Bears, the Patriots offensive line once again went without a holding call against them in protecting Tom Brady), let's look at the "kick heard 'round the world": Justin Tucker's first ever missed PAT which should have sent the Ravens v. Saints game into OT, but instead gave the Saints the win.

The NFL blocked my original posting of this video (do they do that to everyone who shares one of their YouTube posts, or just to me?), so here's another version of it:

Alright, the second time I posted a video for this play, it was yanked. Here's a pair of tweets that cover the kick and Tucker's reaction. Let's see if these get yanked.

If you watched the video and saw Tucker's reaction to his miss, his is the face of a man who's not sure of what he just witnessed. The ball moved twice to his right (the viewer's left) mid-flight. Granted, the guy was 222-222 for PATs and every kicker is bound to miss sooner or later, but Tucker's expression is beyond disappointment. It's shock. It's almost as if he just saw a UFO.

And maybe he did.

Is it possible that the NFL can now control kicks via magnetic fields between the goal posts and the ball itself? Yeah, I know. This sounds like an outlandish conspiracy theory. But hell, I'm the "King of the Sports Conspiracies" so let's consider it for a moment.

For starters, back in 2014 it was announced that "new technology" was using magnetic fields to "track" the football's position on the field. This was inserted into regulation NFL balls, didn't affect their weight or behavior (allegedly), and was designed in conjunction with Disney Research (and yes Disney Research is the same Disney that owns Mickey Mouse and ESPN). How far of a stretch would it be to use that magnetic field for other purposes especially when you have a giant piece of metal known as the goal posts on either end of the field? Remember, too, the NFL has special "kicking" balls (K-balls) which are put into play ONLY for kicking plays, meaning if these balls had this magnetic field technology in them, they would only be in play for things such as field goals and extra points.

Has this technology been used elsewhere? Such as in the NHL? Consider these two plays for starters:

Same idea. A metal area (the goal) where (in this case) a puck with magnetic technology installed will not go through. Recall, the NHL did have a microchip in the puck at one point when they tried the "glowing puck" for TV broadcasts.

Now go back and watch Tucker's kick. Does the ball seem to make not one, but two jerks toward the right goal posts which it sails past? Natural movement, or something else?

I was told a few years ago by a NBA Ball Boy that the NBA used magnets in its balls and rims to "re-set the shot clock" every time a basket was made. What if that technology was used instead to repel and/or attract the ball through the metal rim? It's not impossible. Neither is it in NHL with the goal, or even in the NFL with kicks aimed at the goal posts. Think of how many missed kicks there have been this season, how many have hit the uprights, and how many seem to curve this way and that before going through. Has the NFL taken manipulation to a whole new level?


I watched (well, sorta watched while doing other things like cleaning the house, reading a book, etc.) three games this weekend, and I swear, all three were manipulated in some way. Once you understand that this occurs, you can't help but see how, when, and where games are manipulated. It's a curse, like taking the Red Pill in The Maxtrix: you can't go back to simply watching and enjoying a game.

The first game I witnessed was the Bears v. Dolphins game. The Bears defense which is touted as one of the best in the game laid a total egg. Not only did they not sack Dolphins back-up QB Brock Osweiler, they didn't even knock him down once in the game, despite the fact that two of the 'Fins o-linemen were also back-ups. Of course, when you see the effort given on the following play, you can understand that the Bears weren't destined to win:

Interestingly, in the Bears v. Dolphins game, the Bears lost a TD - which turned in a turnover on the next play - because of a "pick" play run by the Bears TE. Had the TD stood, the game might - coulda, woulda, shoulda - have gone the Bears way. But a similar pick play run by the Steelers in their game against the Bengals wasn't flagged, and as a result, the Steelers won. Of course, the NFL offered an official explanation why this wasn't a penalty, but the "pick" play which is run week after week is one of those subjective calls that can/can't be flagged at an official's discretion.

Game 2 I watched was the Sunday nighter of the Chiefs v. the Patriots. Two takeaways from this game: one, the Patriots (at home, of course where they never lose - which  is something no one ever questions) had zero penalties in this game. They were flagged twice, but one was declined and the second was an offsetting foul. Zero penalties? Not one of the Pats' o-lineman held a defender to protect ol' Tom? C'mon. Does anyone really believe they played a completely clean game? Number two, is Chiefs LB Breeland Speaks deciding not to tackle Tom Brady in what resulted in a TD run by the QB because of his fear of being flagged for unnecessary roughness due to the NFL's crackdown on roughing the passer calls. See how one thing can morph into another in this league? Due to a couple of ridiculous penalties, now defensive players won't tackle the QB out of fear, and that possibly changed the outcome of this game.

Game 3 was the Monday night affair between the 49ers and the Packers. I know, I know. I complain about the Packers a lot, but when Aaron Rodgers again leads the Packers to a come-from-behind-victory after his opponents completely fall apart despite dominating all game (see Sunday Night Week 1 v. the Bears) which leads to the broadcasters saying it was a "Hollywood scripted ending," you have to wonder. Of course, the refs had a hand in this outcome when on a 3rd-and-15 sack of Rodgers late in the 4th quarter was negated when 49ers DB Richard Sherman was flagged for illegal contact. To his credit, Sherman took blame for the foul, but still, what he did is not flagged 9 out of 10 times. And even though "illegal contact" is a point of emphasis now in the NFL with its enforcement up 3x from last season, it's still enforced if/when the refs deem it a penalty - which if you go back to the Patriots v Chiefs game and the zero calls on NE - isn't really all that often.


I said in the midst of my illness last week that Monday Night Football this week between the Redskins and Saints would be a Drew Brees love-fest because he was on the cusp of becoming the NFL's all-time leading passer in yardage. I was not wrong. The funny part (at least to me) was how it happened and the immediate reaction it received. 

In the second quarter with the game already in hand for the Saints (at home, of course), Brees and the Saints were set for their next drive. ESPN announced that he was 35 yards shy of the record and showed a shot of Brees family on the sidelines, having apparently made their way down to the field from their box seats. At that exact moment, this happened:

Nice timing, Mrs. Brees. As Barstool Sports pointed out in their tweet, seemed a little too easy for Brees to complete that record breaking pass. And wasn't it nice that it went for a TD to boot? As many celebrities began sending out congrats to Brees (why? He couldn't read them mid-game), former NFL player Joe Thomas tweeted this:

It was quickly followed by another former NFL player, Dashon Goldson, tweeted this:

So that was two former NFL players - that I was aware of - who thought the play was suspect. This is interesting on many levels which I'm sure you can understand. What else do they find "questionable?" Do they know other plays and/or players who made questionable plays? How often? Which games? Playoffs? Super Bowl? I think you get the picture. Of course, even some pundits raised an eyebrow at it:

That's not the first Skip Bayless tweet to make it on this site. How much does he know about this sort of behavior on the field? What else is suspect that he doesn't tweet about?

I could write about other games and incidents from this Week 5 - like what's up with all the kickers missing all their field goal/extra point attempts? Are the NFL's goal posts magnetized like NBA rims supposedly are? - but this one event in one game sums up everything I write about. Even if MNF was outright rigged for the Saints to win, but a message was sent to the Redskins to let Brees have this "record breaking moment" and they did, well, credibility and integrity are totally out the window in the NFL. Nothing else needs to be said.


I'm a little slow in posting this week because (a) I was out of town all weekend at my nephew's wedding and watched football through my closed eyelids on the couch afterwards and (b) currently have the cold/flu which is going around. So, in essence, I'm posting because I feel obligated even though I really don't care.

Much like the NFL doesn't really care about protecting its athletes. If they did, explain the whole Earl Thomas injury situation outside of the league being a "business" (which only comes into play when they want it to be a business - much like the famous North Dallas Forty quote) or explain how this - or seemingly any "lowering the helmet" incident didn't draw a flag:

That came from the Monday Night Chiefs v. Broncos game which seemed to exist merely to showcase Patrick Mahomes as the "Next Big Thing" in the NFL. (In fact, it seems more and more as if the prime time NFL games are meant to push certain storylines/players. Next Monday is Drew Brees celebration night. Really think he and Saints will lose that game to the Redskins?) Also in this game, which was a Chiefs win thanks to Mahomes talent and perhaps this non-call on the play clock which the referees apparently acknowledged (thanks to Phillip for the tip). Oh, well. Can't take it back now, can you?

The refs also apparently tell players that some calls they make depend on time and place and game situation as NY Giants MLB Alec Ogletree learned Sunday when a ref told him that they, "wouldn't make that call in the Super Bowl." We all knew NFL rules were subjectively enforced despite a rule book for all to follow, but this quote is just further proof that it's really all up for grabs on Sunday (thanks to John for this tip).

Oh yeah, and the Browns were cast to the curb after (Dilly, Dilly) their Thursday Night "Open the Fridges!" Bud Light sponsored win when a horrible spot - which was reviewed - cost them a game clinching first down. Instead, the home team Raiders took the game in OT and won for John Gruden's first win in his second stint as Oakland's head coach.

There's probably more that happened, but I need to lay down.


All right, let me just run this past y'all: what if the new "protect the quarterback" rule that's causing all sorts of controversy is meant to just that? Why, you ask, would the NFL court such problems? Because do you notice anyone talking about player protests around the National Anthem? Hmm... It was just a few weeks ago that every pundit seemed to be on edge about the "lowering the helmet" rule that disrupted more than one preseason game. Now? Anyone see a flag for lowering the helmet? I haven't. But I've seen controversial sacks ad naseum. But no mention of anthem protests and/or lowering the helmet. Perhaps the NFL ain't so dumb.

While we saw a few upsets this week (namely the Vikings dropping an "easy" victory at home against the Bills, and the Lions stuffing the Patriots on Sunday night), there were only two real games of note this week. One, was the Monday night game between the surging Buccaneers against the reeling Steelers. The story was two-fold, the internal strife within the Steelers due to Le'veon Bell's holdout and Antonio Brown's whining, and the appearance of "FitzMagic" in Tampa. It was interesting to watch the game because as it worn on, the Monday Night announcing crew talked about these stories so much, they seemed to almost ignore the action on the field. And the talk was basically, "Bell should be playing for the Steelers already," "Brown will be fine," and "FitzMagic is going to wear out, and do so quickly, perhaps as soon as that night because suspended Jameis Winston is coming back to the team." Guess what happened? FitzMagic threw three early interceptions which set the Bucs back enough to basically cost them the game. Granted, a little FitzMagic brought them within a score (which is the standard practice in prime time games now), but in the end, Big Ben and the Steelers prevailed. Of course, stuff like this, on perhaps one of the most important downs late in the game, didn't hurt their cause:

Then there was the Thursday Night game between the lowly Jets and lowlier Browns.How do you sell this stinkfest of a game to a national audience? Well, consider this: The Browns haven't won since 2016. The coulda/shoulda beat the Steelers in Week 1 had their NCAA record-holding rookie kicker not choked. Then they coulda/shoulda beat the Saints had that same NCAA record-holding kicker not choked a second time (leading to him being cut). Despite this repeated failure, this happens:

What's more curious is that local Cleveland bars had "victory fridges" installed in the offseason. These were chained and padlocked refridgerators filled with Bud Light meant to be opened if/when the Browns finally win, so there'd be free Bud Light to all to celebrate with (Dilly, Dilly). Now isn't it odd that the main sponsor for Thursday Night Football is...wait for it...Bud Light. Wouldn't it be the coincidence of coincidences if the victory fridges filled with Bud Light were opened after Bud Light brought Cleveland fans Thursday Night Football? Amazingly, that is exactly what happened. Much like the Week 1 Bears v. Packers game where the Bears blitzed Aaron Rodgers into injury then forgot how to play defense, the Jets knocked Browns starting QB Tyrod Taylor out of the game (or so we were told), and in stepped rookie No. 1 draft pick Baker Mayfield for the Browns. Suddenly, the Jets couldn't play defense. Mayfield brought the Browns back from a 14-point deficit and Bud Light for all! Was this really a football game or just one giant product placement?

Oh, and by the way, I'm not alone (and neither are you) in thinking this league isn't legit (thanks, Norman, for the tip!):


I'm still at work on wrapping up my next book (The Fix Is Still In), so this week's rundown will be haphazardly quick and to the point.

While I hate to dwell on the Packers, there are a few takeaways from this week's Packers v. Vikings game that are worth mentioning. #1 - Aaron Rodgers is not that injured. I think he is hurt, sure, but the media circus around is knee is more showbiz than medical, and everyone's willing to play along for the show. #2 - The Packers probably should've won the game, and would have, had Clay Matthews not been flagged for a roughing the passer penalty on what appeared to be a completely legal and routine NFL play. Worse yet, the NFL on Tuesday not only said the penalty was correctly assessed, but that the league was going to use the video of it to show how the "grab and pull" technique Matthews used to drop Kirk Cousins is illegal.

#3 - The Packers (and the NFL) brought this controversy on themselves due to the "late hit" that broke Rodgers' collarbone last season. Had they not whined about it, it's likely no new rule would've been discussed/put into effect this season. #4 - Prior to that Matthews flag, the refs seemed to be completely in the Packers' corner. Here's two examples:

#5 - I really think more than anything the flag on Matthews wasn't meant to propel the Vikings to a win (or the tie they wound up with). I think that just like a similar call in the Packers v. Bears Sunday Night game, the flag was meant to keep the game alive, close, and fans watching.

The NFL's concussion protocol is nonsense. And the worse part of it is, the players - who's health is on the line - don't seemingly care. Former players are suing the league over not getting enough compensation for their past injuries and potential brain damage caused by playing the sport, meanwhile current players, like Cam Newton after this hit, didn't miss a snap after taking a clearly severe blow to the head. Who's really to blame here? The medical staff for whitewashing possible injuries? Or players who want to be "tough" and play through the pain?

Otherwise, there was a lot of "home cooking" this Sunday which brought unlikely wins (given each game's early circumstances) to the Saints, Broncos, Buccaneers, and Titans. "Home cooking" also almost brought the Steelers back from the brink of utter destruction in a game in which they should've been down 28-0 (instead of merely 21-0). Instead, a few helping flags had them tied at 21-21 versus the Chiefs, only to ultimately lose 42-37 thanks to budding star Patrick Mahomes. If Mahomes keeps up what's he's been doing thus far, the Chiefs may start getting the sort of "help" that propels teams to the Super Bowl.


It’s only Week 1, and the NFL is up to its usual tricks as if last season never ended. I know there’s only so many ways to spin a football game, but already we’ve been treated to:

On Opening Night, Super Bowl champs the Eagles hosted the previous season’s NFC champs the Falcons who the Eagles knocked out of the playoffs en route to their title. How did that playoff game end last season? With a “heroic” goal-line stand by the Eagles. How’d Game 1 of the 2018 season end? Exactly the same way. It was as if the NFL pressed “repeat” on their stereo.

It was also a horribly boring game to watch with 20+ penalties called during the course of the game. But since it was Opening Night, it couldn’t be a lopsided affair. No, the NFL made sure it came down to the final play – one which the referees made sure happened twice with a ticky-tack “illegal contact” penalty to keep the Falcons’ dying hopes alive for a few more seconds. Amazingly, poor play calling (much like what doomed the Falcons in their ill-fated Super Bowl LI(e) appearance) stopped the Falcons from scoring from the goal-line in their first possession of the game and in their last. These are supposedly professionals failing at an unprecedented level. An 8th grader playing Madden at home could’ve been more successful.

Of course, it could’ve been like Monday Night’s Lions v. Jets game wherein the Jets reportedly knew what plays the Lions were going to run prior to them actually running them. No shock then that Lions QB Matt Stafford threw 4 interceptions in the Jets 48-17 blowout win. Supposedly, the Jets got that information from good film study. Yeah, ok. I guess that’s a better excuse than the NFL’s “Oops, we got that wrong” line that Browns fans have to live with. In the Cleveland v. Pittsburgh game, the refs apparently made the wrong call on a Browns’ 3rd-down sack. Instead settling for a field goal attempt to potentially go up 3-0, the Steelers got new life, and scored a TD. That 4-point differential may not seem like much, but in a game that ended in a 21-21 tie, it was the difference maker. Sorry, Cleveland!

This should be a rhetorical question, but anyone who watches sports regularly knows the answer: Do star players get preferential treatment? Of course they do which is why anyone claiming games aren’t at the very least manipulated because of this fact can go jump in the nearest lake. What isn’t really known is to what level or how far this treatment can extend.

With Colts QB Andrew Luck’s return after a two-year absence, his rival QB, the Bengals Andy Dalton thought it was enough to make mention of it. Dalton basically complained that Luck got better treatment/protection from the refs in the Colts v. Bengals game than he did. Was Dalton correct? Probably. Would it really surprise you? Luck was an apparent NFL Golden Child until his shoulder fell to pieces. They need to protect him more than Dalton, and Dalton recognized this fact.

But perhaps the biggest amount of NFL-backed protection came in the Bears v. Packers game on Sunday night. Aaron Rodgers, the star of two national ad campaigns (State Farm and Izod) with his star “girlfriend” Danica Patrick in attendance on the opening night of the Packers 100th season, injured his knee to the point of needing to being carted off the field. Usually, that spells the end of any players’ game, if not the season (even career). Not Rodgers. Pumped up with more drugs than we can imagine (did anyone from the NFL drug test him post-game?), Rodgers re-emerged from the locker room for the second half and led the Packers to one of the franchise’s most legendary come-from-behind wins in team history.

How was this possible? My honest guess: someone called the Bears at half-time with an official NFL “stand down” order. It’s the only thing that can really explain how the Bears blew a 20-0 lead to a QB that only had one functioning leg. Somehow after halftime the Packers O-line learned how to block while the Bears forgot how to rush a passer. The Bears newest, richest defensive star Khalil Mack shined in the first half with a sack, fumble and recovery, and an interception returned for a touchdown. In the second half? Crickets. According to Chicago newspapers (which merely took an “aw, shucks” stance on this historic loss), the Bears rushed Rodgers with more than four players only three times in the second half. Rodgers couldn’t move. Why would you not blitz him constantly, if nothing more than to knock him around to the point of having to come out for safeties sake? Nope, not the Bears.

Nor would the Bears continue to rush the ball on offense with Jordan Howard who was averaging nearly five yards a carry. Considering this sort of play from Mitchell Trubisky, it might have been a wise decision:

But no more Howard. Even when it was third and one. Even when a first down with less than three minutes remaining would’ve won the game. Or even when losing 24-23 with under two minutes remaining and two timeouts and needing 20 yards to get into field goal position. Instead, the Bears did this:

While one could almost – almost – forgive the Falcons for blowing Super Bowl LI(e) due to poor play calling in that final drive, what the Bears did was inexcusable. It lasted an entire half. You want to blame first year head coach Matt Nagy (or highly sought-after defensive coordinator Vic Fangio) for that? Good, then fire him/them now because once again, an 8th grader playing Madden wouldn’t have been that moronic. Yet, look at the result. Completely nonsensical, but NFL fans are eating it up, a ladle full at a time.


Welcome back for yet another (perhaps the last for me) season of NFL style football. I half-thought of doing a weekly video recap for this season, but then I realized I had better things to do with my life and figured at some point I'd be Alex Jones'd off of YouTube, and I don't need that right now. So you get stuck having to actually read stuff.

I'm rather amazed that going into the 2018 season, the NFL still doesn't have it's shit seemingly together. They can't get a grip on the players kneeling controversy, "concussions" remain a league-wide concern, and the ratings for their broadcasts continue to fall. It may be why the Wall Street Journal suggested NFL owners start selling their teams -- because things aren't getting better.

Especially now that there's this:

As I myself tweeted in response to this play/penalty which enforces the NFL's new "lowering the helmet to make contact" rule, what were football plays last season can now be interpreted as penalties this year. So, when someone like Tom Brady gets sacked to possibly end a Patriots' drive, the NFL can now flag the play (at the refs' discression), and keep the drive alive. This WILL happen. This WILL alter the outcome of games. This WILL help determine which teams make and/or miss the playoffs. And, my guess is, this is exactly why this rule now exists. It makes life much more difficult on the defensive players while easing up on the offense in order to create higher scoring, more "exciting" games which can be manipulated on the spot by penalties (whether real or imagined).

So, sit back, enjoy the show, and don't take any of it too seriously. Because, remember, it's all a "presentation of the National Football League."